⌘K
Cluster rating
iEvery review at all 18 locations over every review at all 18, not the average of their 18 ratings. Google publishes no rating at this level, so this figure is ours. The weighting is the point: averaging the ratings would read 4.34, because a location with 392 reviews would count the same as one with 1,044.
4.3
across 12,400 reviews at 18 locations
Rating in this period
iThe same weighting over the reviews in the period above. 4.41 is On track. It sits higher than the cluster rating, which means what these 18 are getting now is better than the average they are being pulled into.
4.41
+0.11 against the cluster rating
Locations falling
iLocations whose second half of the period rated worse than their first half. Direction rather than level: a location can sit mid-table on rating and still be the one to open.
8
of 18 in this period
Locations at risk
iLocations within 3 one-star reviews of showing a lower public rating. A single location reads this as a distance; a cluster can only count who is in the band. Worked out across every review, so the period above does not move it.
1
Closest: Connaught Place
The cluster rating and the count beside it are lifetime figures, weighted across every review. Every other figure follows the period above unless it says otherwise.
Locations to look into
iA location shows here when it is within 3 one-star reviews of a lower public rating, or its rating moved -0.25 or worse over the period. It is not a ranking: a good period shows nobody here at all. The mark on each bar is the cluster's own rating in this period. 3 of 18 in this periodTop issues
iAn issue counts as shared when half or more of the locations in scope have it, and a shared issue is the account's to fix once. Below half, it belongs to the locations carrying it. Each strip below is the 18 locations, worst movement first, lit where the issue is present, with the halfway line drawn. In the selected periodWhere a campaign pays
iRanked by the fewest five-star reviews to the next Google rating, among locations already running better than their public number: a campaign locks in what the period has earned. Eligibility compares this period's rating with the Google rating; the reviews and the weeks read the whole ledger as of today.Indirapuram
14 five-star reviews to reach 4.4
Under a week with a campaignAbout 7 weeks at the current pace
Start campaign
Pitampura
30 five-star reviews to reach 4.3
About 1 week with a campaignAbout 34 weeks at the current pace
Start campaign
Rajouri Garden
54 five-star reviews to reach 4.3
About 2 weeks with a campaignAbout 37 weeks at the current pace
Start campaign
1 location needs fixes before a campaign pays off: Lajpat Nagar. See why in Fix
3 locations are already running above 4.6: Vasant Kunj, South Extension and Khan Market. Asking them for more reviews moves the number less than the same effort elsewhere.